CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 8435
Install intersection conflict warning systems (ICWS) for two-lane at two-lane intersections
Description:
Prior Condition: No intersection conflict warning systems
Category: Signs
Study: Multi-State Safety Evaluation of Intersection Conflict Warning Systems (ICWS), Himes et al, 2016
| Star Quality Rating: |
[View score details]
|
| Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 0.78 |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.15 |
| Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
|---|---|
| Value: | 22 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
| Adjusted Standard Error: | |
| Unadjusted Standard Error: | 15 |
| Applicability | |
|---|---|
| Crash Type: | All |
| Crash Severity: | All |
| Roadway Types: | Not specified |
| Number of Lanes: | 2 |
| Road Division Type: | |
| Speed Limit: | |
| Area Type: | Rural |
| Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Traffic Volume: | |
| Time of Day: | Not specified |
| If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
| Intersection Type: | Roadway/roadway (not interchange related) |
| Intersection Geometry: | 4-leg |
| Traffic Control: | Stop-controlled |
| Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
| Average Major Road Volume : | |
| Average Minor Road Volume : | |
| Development Details | |
|---|---|
| Date Range of Data Used: | |
| Municipality: | |
| State: | MO |
| Country: | |
| Type of Methodology Used: | Before/after using empirical Bayes or full Bayes |
| Sample Size (crashes): | 37 crashes after |
| Sample Size (sites): | 6 sites before, 6 sites after |
