CMF / CRF Details
CMF ID: 4859
Installation of passing relief lane
Description: Addition of passing relief lanes between 1.0 to 2.9 miles
Prior Condition: No Prior Condition(s)
Category: Roadway
Study: Evaluating Performance And Making Best Use of Passing Relief Lanes, Bagdade et al., 2012
Star Quality Rating: | [View score details] |
Rating Points Total: | 50 |
Crash Modification Factor (CMF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 0.71 |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 0.155 |
Crash Reduction Factor (CRF) | |
---|---|
Value: | 29 (This value indicates a decrease in crashes) |
Adjusted Standard Error: | |
Unadjusted Standard Error: | 15.5 |
Applicability | |
---|---|
Crash Type: | All |
Crash Severity: | A (serious injury),B (minor injury),C (possible injury) |
Roadway Types: | Principal Arterial Other |
Street Type: | |
Minimum Number of Lanes: | 2 |
Maximum Number of Lanes: | 2 |
Number of Lanes Direction: | |
Number of Lanes Comment: | |
Crash Weather: | Not specified |
Road Division Type: | Undivided |
Minimum Speed Limit: | 55 |
Maximum Speed Limit: | 55 |
Speed Unit: | mph |
Speed Limit Comment: | |
Area Type: | Rural |
Traffic Volume: | |
Average Traffic Volume: | |
Time of Day: | All |
If countermeasure is intersection-based | |
Intersection Type: | |
Intersection Geometry: | |
Traffic Control: | |
Major Road Traffic Volume: | |
Minor Road Traffic Volume: | |
Average Major Road Volume : | |
Average Minor Road Volume : |
Development Details | |
---|---|
Date Range of Data Used: | |
Municipality: | |
State: | MI |
Country: | |
Type of Methodology Used: | Regression cross-section |
Sample Size (sites): | 331 sites |
Other Details | |
---|---|
Included in Highway Safety Manual? | No |
Date Added to Clearinghouse: | May 01, 2013 |
Comments: |